http://moonshine.homedns.org:2655/pano entrance to the world of panoramas in Asia... Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:04:50 +0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 http://moonshine.homedns.org:2655/pano/tech/point-and-shoot-panoramas/comment-page-1/#comment-123 etegration Sat, 20 Sep 2008 16:34:35 +0000 http://moonshine.homedns.org:2655/pano/?page_id=1093#comment-123 Hi panda, it's been a long time since i saw your comments! Thanks for taking the time to post! You can still usethe P5000, it's still a good camera and one of the popular ones with the FC-E8. The P5100 i am testing now has a common problems among it's user. SLOW FOCUSING! but overall, the camera is fine but of course, thing I can always attain through my DSLR, i can do with the P5100. Hi panda, it’s been a long time since i saw your comments! Thanks for taking the time to post! You can still usethe P5000, it’s still a good camera and one of the popular ones with the FC-E8. The P5100 i am testing now has a common problems among it’s user. SLOW FOCUSING! but overall, the camera is fine but of course, thing I can always attain through my DSLR, i can do with the P5100.

]]> http://moonshine.homedns.org:2655/pano/tech/point-and-shoot-panoramas/comment-page-1/#comment-118 panda08 Sat, 20 Sep 2008 11:29:59 +0000 http://moonshine.homedns.org:2655/pano/?page_id=1093#comment-118 oh. i m quit impressive with the quality of the pano. i also have fce8 len but my camera was the old cookpix 5000. last time, cp5000 and fce8 was a very common setup for pano shooting... however cp5000 was a 5mp camera so the quality was quit loudcy for full screen display. how was this cp5100 response time? was it good? oh. i m quit impressive with the quality of the pano. i also have fce8 len but my camera was the old cookpix 5000. last time, cp5000 and fce8 was a very common setup for pano shooting… however cp5000 was a 5mp camera so the quality was quit loudcy for full screen display. how was this cp5100 response time? was it good?

]]>